Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission directs staff to draft revised floor-area rules modeled on Corte Madera

Larkspur City Planning Commission · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended discussion, the commission asked staff to prepare a draft ordinance to revise Larkspur's floor-area-ratio (FAR) rules—using Corte Madera's approach as a model—addressing slope, subterranean exemptions, caps and an objective exception process, and to return with test cases and a draft for review.

The Larkspur City Planning Commission spent substantial time on May 12 discussing possible revisions to the city's floor-area-ratio (FAR) rules and directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance modeled on Corte Madera'style limits for commission review.

Staff presented a side-by-side analysis showing that Corte Madera'style formulas would have rendered many recent Larkspur projects compliant without repeated exceptions. Commissioners and staff debated whether to retain any FAR standard, to move to an envelope-based system, or to adopt Corte Madera'style limits with objective criteria. Topics included whether garages or small accessory structures should be exempt, whether subterranean space should be discounted, how slope factors into allowable floor area, and whether an exception process should remain.

Commissioners voiced concerns that Larkspur's current slope-based FAR is outdated and that the existing rules force frequent exceptions; several commissioners favored adopting Corte Madera'style rules or a similarly tailored approach. Staff cautioned that any new rules must be objective to comply with state housing laws and suggested the department would prepare a draft ordinance, test it against recent projects, and return to the commission for further refinement.

The commission asked staff to: draft an ordinance reflecting Corte Madera'style calculations with any Larkspur-specific adjustments, include an objective exception framework (examples: very small lots, easements, heritage trees), run test cases against recent approvals, and bring a formal draft back for commission review and public hearing. The direction was not a formal adoption but a clear policy instruction to staff to prepare and return with a tangible proposal.