Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cook County SD 130 debates sidewalk, gates and speed bumps for Lincoln School safety
Summary
Board members and staff discussed layered safety options — oversized sidewalk, temporary swing gates, speed bumps, crossing guards — for Lincoln School arrival and dismissal; staff said the city is willing to consider temporary gates and cost-splitting but engineering constraints (sewer, drainage, ADA width) and maintenance limit immediate decisions.
Cook County SD 130 trustees spent the bulk of the meeting discussing potential site improvements at Lincoln School aimed at reducing pedestrian risk during arrival and dismissal. Staff presented options and repeatedly cautioned that no decisions had been made and that many solutions depend on city approval and engineering constraints.
Staff said the district has shared a preliminary site-improvement plan with the mayor of Blue Island and the city is open to temporary swing gates during arrival and dismissal and to cost-sharing for repaving. Staff emphasized that Canal Street is city property, which limits what the district may unilaterally install without an intergovernmental agreement or permit.
Board members and staff reviewed several layered options: installing an oversized sidewalk to accommodate vehicle pullovers (staff said a compliant width in this case would be about 7 feet rather than the typical 5 feet), placing temporary swing gates to close the street at arrival/dismissal times, adding multiple speed bumps (with winter-maintenance concerns for plows), and short-term measures such as a crossing guard or portable corraling devices for queuing parents. Staff also warned of underground sewer and drainage infrastructure in the street that could raise cost and complexity if sidewalks or regrading were required.
A speaker noted the price shown in the proposal — "$63,000" — and urged the board not to fixate on that figure alone. In the meeting, an attendee said, "I don't think we should focus on the number of $63,000 — it's the proposal that was put forth by Shamrock with no discussion by the board, no decisions, apparently no conversation between the building admin and the city about what was needed." That comment prompted staff to reiterate that the plan was informational and that the district had discussed the issue in prior closed-session work but had not endorsed the vendor proposal.
Board members asked staff to return with a narrowed, realistic list of options grounded in further conversations with the city and the building principal. Trustees suggested an on-site visit with a Blue Island representative before the next board meeting and encouraged involvement from parents and the building principal in the follow-up conversation.
No formal motion to fund construction or to adopt any particular improvement was made; staff were directed to follow up with the city, confirm what is feasible with the sewer and drainage constraints, explore cost-sharing possibilities, and report back to the board.
