Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daggett County MBA approves cash and disbursement reports; transcript shows inconsistent amount
Summary
The Daggett County Municipal Building Authority voted to accept the cash summary and accounts receivable for Fund 45 and approved a disbursement summary for 06/09–06/19, but the meeting transcript records two different disbursement amounts ($218,353.20 and $218,352.20) that were not reconciled on the record.
The Daggett County Municipal Building Authority on June 24 voted to accept its cash summary as of June 23, 2025, and the accounts receivable report for Fund 45 (Municipal Building Authority). A motion to accept the cash summary and accounts receivable was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote.
The Authority then moved to accept the disbursement summary for June 9–June 19. During the motion the Committee member cited an amount of $218,353.20 from the packet. The Chair later used nearly identical motion language but cited $218,352.20; the discrepancy in the transcript was not resolved on the record. The Board voted to accept and acknowledge receipt of the disbursement summary by voice vote.
Why it matters: The disbursement and cash reports reflect outgoing payments and the near-term cash position for the Authority. Staff noted that a PTIF account had recently been created in anticipation of the bond closing and that reimbursements tied to the bond were expected to post after the closing.
Financial actions recorded on the transcript were approved by voice vote; individual roll-call votes were not recorded and motion makers and seconders were identified by role rather than by name on the record. Because the transcript contains two different amounts for the disbursement listing, staff should confirm the correct figure and, if needed, provide an amended entry to the minutes or a clarified record.
