Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Motorsports Cup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Powhatan supervisors to deny proposed motorsports park near Appomattox River
Summary
Dozens of Powhatan residents told the Board of Supervisors during public comment that a planned motorsports park would bring unacceptable noise, traffic, environmental risk and emergency‑access problems to a rural area beside the Appomattox River, and asked the board to require site‑specific studies before permitting moves forward.
Dozens of residents told the Powhatan County Board of Supervisors on May 18 that a proposed motorsports park near the Appomattox River is incompatible with the county’s rural character and should be denied.
"I respectfully urge you to deny the approval of the proposed motorsports park beside the Appomattox River," said Matt Fisher, a District 2 resident, who listed noise, dust, lighting, and runoff as immediate concerns. Several speakers described collecting signatures and neighborhood opposition: "In the last five days, we've gathered 239 signatures from nearby residents against a motorsports park in this location," Nancy Wise said as she submitted a petition to be entered into the record.
Speakers repeatedly pressed for objective, site‑specific analyses that they said were missing from the applicants’ materials. Richard Brumfield and other commenters said no formal traffic study, noise modeling, stormwater review or emergency‑access assessment had been provided to demonstrate the site could safely host large events. "Approving first and studying impacts later transfers the risk to surrounding residents," Brumfield said, urging the board to require traffic, noise, stormwater and emergency services analyses before any approval.
Other residents described quality‑of‑life impacts. Matthew Stevens, whose property borders Skippers Creek, said evening and weekend motorcycle noise already carries across long distances in eastern Powhatan and that multiple bikes running together would "destroy the peace of our home and our community." Several speakers argued the local road network and a single‑lane private easement serving the site would be inadequate for spectators, trailers and emergency vehicles.
Multiple speakers also raised environmental concerns tied to the site's proximity to the river and to private wells: runoff from fuel, oil, tire residue and sediment, they said, could harm wetlands, groundwater and downstream properties unless thoroughly mitigated.
Speakers asked the board to treat the conditional use permit (CUP) as a site‑specific review rather than assume compatibility based on prior zoning changes. "If this project is truly compatible with the surrounding area, then the data should support that conclusion," Brumfield said.
Board members and staff noted the matter will return for formal consideration at later public hearings; Theresa Kelly reminded the audience the next step in the review will not be before July and encouraged residents to continue to ask the applicants for more complete information. No board action on the CUP was taken at the May 18 meeting; the board extended the public‑comment period to accommodate all speakers and moved on to its consent and new‑business items.
What happened next: the board approved routine consent items and advanced several administrative resolutions; the motorsports CUP remains pending further hearings and staff review.
