Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parents and advocates press board on special-education legal spending; board advances service-delivery logs to second reading

Williamson County Board of Education · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public commenters and advocates highlighted repeated year-end supplements to the district's special-education legal account and urged greater oversight; the board voted 9-1 to move an amended child-find/special-education policy (including service-delivery logs) to second reading.

Speakers at the May 18 meeting urged the board to scrutinize recurring legal supplements for special-education litigation and to require clearer proof that IEP services are delivered.

Williamson County parent Bill Barksdale told the board the district's public records show repeated supplemental appropriations for the OCS (special-education legal) account over several years: he said the board authorized roughly $200,000 in May 2022, $725,000 in May 2023 and $300,000 in May 2024, and that those supplemental measures total about $1.45 million across five fiscal years. Barksdale asked why the base budget is not adjusted to reflect recurring legal expenditures and what mechanisms the board has to review decisions that lead to litigation before costs are incurred.

Dr. Bonnie Barksdale, a parent and associate professor of elementary and special-education at Middle Tennessee State, described a due-process case involving her son and said the family pursued an independent education evaluation and formal challenges under federal rules. She argued that recurring litigation and the district's approach to some IEP decisions suggest systemic governance issues that contribute to legal costs.

Christie Bailey, a special-education advocate who represents families, testified that missed IEP services are not isolated events and urged the board to require mandatory districtwide service-delivery logs so families can verify that required therapies and supports are actually provided.

The board discussed and voted 9-1 to move an amendment to policy 4.202 (child-find and special education) to second reading; board members emphasized that the amendment would restore or require service-delivery logs for therapists (occupational, physical, speech-language), both to inform parents and to help the district monitor caseloads and staffing needs.

Administration responses: Superintendent Golden and staff said the district has budgeted annually for legal expenses (noting a $340,000 baseline for the line in recent years), that year-to-year variations reflect unpredictable casework, and that the district contracts with outside attorneys for special-education litigation; Golden agreed to provide board members a more detailed litigation-summary and a breakdown of legal expenses by case or resolution on request.

What happens next: The amended policy will go to the policy committee for second reading in June; the board asked administration to produce litigation summaries and a three-year breakdown of legal expenses by case or resolution.