Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Tod Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Danbury zoning panel approves new Downtown Transit-Oriented Development district
Summary
The Danbury Zoning Commission unanimously approved amendments on Jan. 28, 2025 to create a Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) district that doubles the mapped downtown acreage and adds height, parking and sustainability incentives; supporters praised it as a step to revitalize Main Street while opponents urged more planning for schools, homelessness and infrastructure.
Get email alerts on the Downtown Tod Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Danbury Zoning Commission voted unanimously Jan. 28 to approve a package of zoning amendments establishing a Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) district designed to reshape the city’s downtown and spur private investment.
The changes, filed by Planning Director Waleed Al Bakri, would expand the downtown zoning footprint from about 210 acres to roughly 450 acres, raise base height limits and add bonus height for projects that include affordable housing, loosen off-street parking requirements in the core and add new design and sustainability standards, Al Bakri told the commission.
Why it matters: Supporters said the package removes regulatory barriers that have discouraged downtown investment and allows the city to qualify for funding and coordinate infrastructure improvements. Opponents and several residents, however, urged caution, saying the plan lacks a parallel school-capacity, homelessness or full infrastructure funding plan and could strain existing services if development proceeds too quickly.
In his presentation, Al Bakri said the regulations are the culmination of prior work — a 2019 TOD study, a 2022 affordable housing study and the city’s 2023 Plan of Conservation and Development — and extensive community engagement. He summarized key elements: expand the downtown boundary to about 450 acres; set a typical maximum height of 85 feet with the potential to reach about 125 feet when developers meet incentive criteria; allow zero off-street parking inside a mapped “main-street” area and a 50% reduction elsewhere in the TOD district; require undergrounding of new utilities for new construction and add sustainability incentives such as permeable paving and on-site water reuse.
Supporters at the hearing — including property owners, developers and City Council member Duane Perkins — said the changes will promote density, support main-street retail and make better use of municipal parking. "I urge every one of you ... to think forward, support the kind of growth that Danbury needs," one supporter said during public comment.
Developers’ representatives told the commission that reduced parking requirements and greater height and design flexibility would lower construction costs for structured parking, activate underused municipal garages and make redevelopment more financially feasible.
Public concerns: Several residents and commenters urged the commission to pause or amend the proposal to ensure schools, sewer and road networks can handle new residents. Heather Lorenz, who said the city’s schools are already overcapacity, asked how the plan would address school overcrowding and where new school capacity would be found. Robert Malillo urged caution and proposed a moratorium or phased approach if infrastructure plans are not in place.
Director Al Bakri and commissioners repeatedly noted that the zoning change itself does not build housing or infrastructure and that any future site plan or development application will require engineering and traffic studies, utility plans and additional review by city engineers and the planning commission. Al Bakri said the zoning updates are the "engine" needed to qualify for funding and to attract investment that would then help justify and unlock infrastructure improvements.
Vote and next steps: After public comment and discussion the commission closed the public hearing, moved the petition to the top of old business and voted by roll call to approve the regulations; the chair announced the motion carried unanimously. The director said applications under the new rules would still be subject to site plan review and any required utility, traffic and stormwater studies before construction.
What remains unclear: The zoning amendments create incentives for affordable housing but do not mandate units; Al Bakri and staff said mandatory affordable-housing requirements would likely face legal challenge and that tax or subsidy incentives remain matters for the city council and other bodies, not the zoning text itself. The timing and scale of resulting development depends on how soon applicants file proposals and whether the city and state secure infrastructure funding.
The commission adjourned at about 9:31 p.m. The adopted regulations and supporting materials are available through the City of Danbury planning and zoning office and on the city website.
