Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and students press Parkland board over alleged bullying failures; administration pledges review
Summary
Multiple parents, a community safety group and a student told the board that district anti‑bullying policy is not being operationalized consistently, citing missing pattern‑tracking, inconsistent investigations and a parent report that a student required inpatient hospitalization after alleged bullying.
Several parents, a community action group and a fourth‑grade student pressed the Parkland board during public comment about what they described as repeated failures to protect students from bullying.
Tracy Sorrentino, co‑chair of Parkland Action Committee for Student Safety (PACS), summarized the committee’s findings and distributed a nine‑point list alleging systemic problems: absence of a consistent evidentiary standard for identifying bullying, the handling of incidents in isolation rather than as patterns, and inadequate, nontransparent communication with families. "Victims in your high school do not feel safe reporting their bullying experiences," Sorrentino said, and the group urged urgent attention and a clear escalation model.
One parent described a recent crisis: Julie Kalinowski said her daughter had been repeatedly targeted, that the family pursued district meetings and emails for months, and that her daughter required inpatient hospitalization last month. "That crisis was completely preventable," Kalinowski said, and she told the board the district’s open‑door pledge had not matched the family’s experience with timely outreach.
A fourth‑grade student, Grayson Moyer, spoke emotionally about how bullying had hurt his sister and read a list of young people who died by suicide after bullying, urging the board to act to protect future students.
Superintendent Dr. Matson and district administrative staff responded by reiterating that the district has an anti‑bullying policy and procedures and that administrators investigate and involve the superintendent’s team as appropriate. Dr. Matson said the administration would continue to review cases and is open to communication and suggested administrators have met individually with some parents. He also acknowledged there is more work to do to ensure consistent execution of policy across buildings.
Next steps: Board members thanked public commenters and said the administration and board will continue discussing the group’s findings. The district offered to facilitate further conversations with families and to provide clarifying information on process and timelines when appropriate.
What remains unresolved: PACS and multiple parents asked for transparent, centralized tracking of incidents, clearer thresholds for substantiation and standardized communication timelines for families; the administration affirmed openness to suggestions but did not announce a specific review timetable during the workshop.
