Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Corrections Fiscal Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Transparency bill on sentencing costs fails in committee amid clerk concerns over unfunded mandate

Criminal Justice Committee · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB479, the 'Fiscal Truth in Sentencing' measure to require quarterly incarceration and sentencing cost reports, failed in committee after clerks warned it would impose an unfunded mandate and members split over cost and feasibility.

A bill to standardize quarterly reporting on incarceration and sentencing costs failed to advance from the Criminal Justice Committee on May 19.

Representative Knox, sponsor of HB479 (the Fiscal Truth in Sentencing Act), said the measure would require the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to publish regular reports and projections so legislators and appropriators can plan for future corrections spending. The committee adopted two amendments that moved reporting responsibility away from district clerks and toward DPS, and adjusted references to children’s-code compliance.

Debbie Hudnell, executive director of the Louisiana Clerk’s Association, testified that the earlier draft would have imposed an unfunded mandate on 64 parish clerks of court because the data requested are not currently collected and many offices lack in‑house programmers. Hudnell said clerks receive no state funds and would have to procure outside programming support.

Supporters including the ACLU framed the bill as necessary to ground sentencing and appropriations decisions in data. Opponents raised concerns about the cost, the ability of crime labs and clerks to produce required detail and, on final vote, a substitute motion to involuntarily defer carried: the roll call showed four yeas and seven nays, and the bill did not leave committee.

Proponents said the information could allow five‑year projections to inform prison planning and programming; critics called it an unfunded operational burden.