Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Marysmantle topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects Mary's Mantle rezoning after hours of neighbor opposition
Summary
After a lengthy public hearing dominated by neighbors' concerns about flooding, traffic and property values, the Southfield City Council voted down a rezoning request that would have allowed Mary's Mantle to expand into a 7.5-acre Inkster Road site.
The Southfield City Council rejected a proposal to rezone a 7.52-acre parcel on Inkster Road on May 18, voting down a request from Mary's Mantle, a faith-based transitional housing organization, after a prolonged public hearing that drew dozens of residents.
Mary's Mantle board president Dr. Ken Kernan told the council the nonprofit operates a structured, residential program that helps expectant mothers with accountability, education and work plans, and emphasized that the organization has "exactly 0 police incidents" at its current site and conducts background checks and mandatory screening. He said the new plan would include a maternity house with 6–8 mothers, 13 townhouses and on-site staff, and that the proposal would preserve substantially more green space than a conventional subdivision.
Neighbors who live directly behind and adjacent to the parcel urged the council to deny the rezoning. Donna Vater, who said her basement floods "every single time it rains," warned that development on the wooded lot would increase runoff and destroy an important wildlife corridor, adding that "these trees are 80, 90 years old" and cannot be replaced by newly planted saplings. Larry Vater, Donna Vater's husband, described walking the parcel and finding standing water and clay soils that could limit the effectiveness of retention basins.
Ricardo Walker and other longtime residents said rezoning from single-family estate to a residential unit development district would set a precedent that could change the neighborhood's low-density character and harm property values. "This proposed change in designation . . . represents a permanent shift in land use patterns," Walker said, urging the council to preserve the community's stability.
Supporters of Mary's Mantle, including neighbors who volunteered with the nonprofit, said the organization has long ties to Southfield, does not provide medical care on-site and serves women "of all faiths and denominations." Fred Nager, the property's owner, told the council he had owned the parcel for decades and said the nonprofit's track record made it a good candidate to develop the site.
City staff said technical reviews had addressed many concerns: the city assessor prepared a memo concluding the project was unlikely to produce external obsolescence that would lower nearby property values; public works and engineering advised that the development would be required to meet commercial stormwater standards and contain stormwater on-site; and planners described tree-protection and replacement plans with a 2:1 replacement requirement for trees over 6 inches in diameter. Planners also explained adjustments to parking requirements that reduced the plan's required spaces from the 80s to the low-50s by removing double-counted daycare spaces.
Council members acknowledged the nonprofit's mission but stressed they had to weigh residents' technical concerns and neighborhood fit. Council president Pro Tem Hogue, who moved approval, did not receive enough support. The clerk's roll call showed six "No" votes and one absence; the motion failed.
The council advised the petitioner to work further with the planning department on alternative locations or a revised plan that addresses resident concerns. The council did not approve the rezoning; the petition is therefore denied as presented and may be revised and resubmitted.
