Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Richmond City Redevelopment Commission approves 2016 TIF pass-through, hears annual TIF report from Baker Tilly
Summary
The commission approved a 2016 TIF pass‑through determination for overlapping taxing units and received Baker Tilly’s annual TIF report, which reviewed allocation area boundaries, bond obligations and projected revenues.
On May 19, 2016, the Richmond City Redevelopment Commission voted by voice assent to approve the 2016 TIF pass‑through determination for overlapping taxing units and received the commission’s annual TIF report from consultant Baker Tilly.
Baker Tilly’s presenter told the commission the body must decide whether incremental assessed value should pass through to overlapping taxing entities and that the required notices must be sent to those units and submitted to the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance by June 15. The presenter warned that missing the state deadline could result in automatic withholding by the state.
Staff summarized the commission’s current fiscal position, noting the commission continues to hold the former hospital site on its books until a conveyance contract transfers the property to Richmond City. Staff also said the total funds available in Allocation Area One for new projects were read for the record and that the figure includes roughly $300,000 in expected revenue this year.
The presentation included TIF revenue and debt slides: Baker Tilly reviewed annual TIF collections for the commission, described outstanding bond series paid from incremental taxes (including a Series A bond the presenter described as “일 억 삼천 만 달러” — approximately $130 million — and Series B amounts read orally), and outlined maturities for those series. The presenter explained that some bonds were reissued for expansion projects and that developers are contractually responsible for any shortfall in project revenue; the city itself does not assume repayment if developers fail to deliver expected revenues.
Commissioners and staff discussed timing of tax transfers after a late payment by a company in the Midwest Industrial Park; staff explained county rules prevent mid‑cycle transfers and that the effect is a delay until the next tax distribution rather than a permanent loss. The commission approved the pass‑through consent by voice vote.
The commission asked staff and Baker Tilly to follow up on questions raised during the presentation; no roll‑call tallies were recorded in the transcript, and the motions were approved by unanimous voice assent as reflected in the meeting record.
The meeting concluded with the commission moving on to Project Phoenix items and procedural adjournment.
