Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After intensive site walk, board waives Fairway View public hearing and grants applicant 60‑day extension
Summary
Following a site walk attended by residents and staff, the Town of Wells Planning Board found the Fairway View Village amendment application complete, chose to waive a separate public hearing, and granted the applicant a 60‑day extension to provide guardrail calculations and complete outstanding items; staff issued a default notice listing guardrails, stormwater ponds and parking striping as defaults.
The Town of Wells Planning Board took action May 18 on the Fairway View Village Subdivision after a detailed site walk and community input, finding the application complete for review, waiving a separate public hearing, and granting the applicant a 60‑day extension to submit guardrail calculations and revised plans.
Planning staff reported that the Saturday site walk drew more than 20 condominium owners and several board members and identified multiple construction and safety concerns: short sections of guardrail relative to the original 2020 approval, exposed outlet pipes at stormwater ponds that should be buried with 12 inches of cover, low spots on pond berms that might require raising or analysis, standing water in swales indicating insufficient slope, and several areas where parking striping did not match as-built conditions. Staff said they produced a default violation notice that lists the outstanding items and gives the applicant 14 days to respond.
"We have 14 days to provide that," planning staff said, listing the guardrails not installed per the 2020 approval, stormwater ponds 17P and 18P not constructed, and parking striping incomplete as default items.
The board voted to find the amendment application complete for the purpose of scheduling a hearing, then—based on robust resident participation during the site walk—voted to waive the requirement for a separate public hearing. That procedural decision did not remove the requirement that the applicant address the outstanding construction and safety items identified by staff.
Applicant Walter Woods of Yorkville Design Center asked the board for time to return with calculations and additional materials. He told the board he expected to have much of the required information within days and requested up to 60 days; the board granted the 60‑day extension. Woods also offered to place additional escrow funds to secure completion if necessary, saying he had about $121,000 already held related to DEP issues and was "willing on those 4 to put another $25,000 up, after the occupancy," to provide additional financial assurance.
Board members emphasized the need for field verification of parking dimensions and confirmed they would not approve any amendment that resulted in fewer parking spaces than previously required. Staff and the applicant discussed potential next steps, including verifying missing parking spaces, burrowing exposed outlet pipes, raising berms where necessary or providing engineering analysis to justify current elevations, and returning at the next or a subsequent meeting with revised plans and calculations.
Next steps: the applicant will submit guardrail calculations and revised plans within 60 days; staff will review the materials as planning office completeness agent and report back to the board. A default violation notice was produced and will be issued per staff's timeline.
