Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff outlines RFP timeline and public-hearing steps for pipeline development project
Summary
Quincy City staff presented a timeline for a proposed 'pipeline development' project including potential property acquisition, an upcoming committee-of-the-whole site meeting, a three-week respondent window for an RFP, a commission public hearing and a subsequent city council vote; residents raised process and complaint-handling concerns.
Quincy City Council heard an update on a proposed “pipeline development” project during its meeting. A presenter who identified herself in the meeting as Claudia Smith said she had been asked to prepare the update and described the next steps if the city proceeds with acquisition of the property and a development plan.
Smith said the city is conducting preliminary development work and, if the council approves purchase of the property, would issue a request for proposals. Respondents would have approximately three weeks to submit development concepts and team qualifications, Smith said, and the city would review proposals to determine the best use for the land before negotiating with a selected respondent. She told the council a committee-of-the-whole site meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 30, and that the commission that reviews land use would conduct the formal public hearing and then make a recommendation to the council.
If the council votes to approve a development or lease, the developer would then apply for required construction permits and the city’s departments would review planning and construction documents, Smith said. She also told the meeting that some uses are not permitted by right in the relevant zoning district and that any proposed use would require board approval.
Council members and participants asked clarifying questions about timing, allowed uses, and how the city would shape terms in the RFP to steer outcomes. The presenter reiterated that notification and public-hearing procedures would be followed and that the commission’s public hearing would generate the official record of public comment for the project.
The meeting did not record a formal vote or council action on the acquisition during the portions of the transcript provided. The next procedural step identified in the discussion was the committee-of-the-whole site meeting and the issuance of the RFP if the council approves purchase of the parcel.
