Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Assessment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Water commissioners debate special-assessment approach, plan council memo for June
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a draft special-assessment policy and a tariff/connection-fee alternative that would impose a 10-year connection window; staff will present the memo to the common council for direction in June after further review and finalization.
Commissioner Dan Dukniak said the commission should give the council options for addressing project financing and system redundancy, noting that looping mains improve water quality and system resiliency.
The board reviewed a staff draft that lays out two approaches: the traditional special-assessment process and a tariff-based contribution with a 10-year connection window. Under the draft tariff approach, properties that connect within 10 years of project completion would pay a connection fee equivalent to what a special assessment would have been; properties that do not connect within that window would not be charged, the memo says.
A commissioner who reviewed the packet said they were unable to find statutory language or administrative-code support in the materials and recommended consulting the Public Service Commission before finalizing policy. "I tried again yesterday and a little bit this morning to try and find the basis for this in the statutes or in the Wisconsin administrative code or on the public service site," the commissioner said.
Commissioners debated who ultimately bears costs of projects that are only partly assessed. One participant said the council's recent use of indefinite deferment means about $827,000 in project costs remain tracked but not yet assessed. Staff clarified that indefinite deferments are tied to the property and collected when an owner hooks up, but acknowledged the city carries those balances in the interim.
Staff said the draft memo is intended to present the policy options to the common council in June for direction. Commissioners agreed to review the memo, provide feedback to staff, and have staff present the item to council on June 16, with a commission meeting scheduled for June 9 to finalize any recommended language.
The discussion focused on policy trade-offs — speeding project installation and system redundancy versus clarity about who pays for what — and on ensuring staff has legal and procedural support before council action. No formal policy change was adopted by the commission at the meeting; the item will be returned with edits and any legal guidance requested.
