Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Whistleblower Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Halifax County committee tables whistleblower policy after debate over anonymous complaints
Summary
The policy, drafted after a State audit of the Victim Witness Program, was tabled 3-0. Committee members debated whether to make the draft countywide, how reports should be routed and whether anonymous reporting should be allowed.
Halifax County’s Policy & Personnel Committee voted unanimously Feb. 11 to table a draft Whistleblower Policy and asked County Administrator Ron Brade to rewrite it as a countywide policy.
Brade told the committee the draft grew out of a State-conducted audit of the Victim Witness Program managed by Sharron Garrett and that Garrett had prepared the draft from a State template. Brade said he believed the document would be more useful if rewritten so that it applied across all Halifax County departments rather than only to the Victim Witness Program.
The committee’s discussion centered on two practical questions: who should receive and investigate allegations, and whether the policy should allow anonymous reports. Supervisor Dennis Witt said allegations should flow from an employee’s immediate supervisor to the County Administrator and warned that adding additional personnel to investigations would complicate the process for a small county. Witt also said he preferred removing anonymous reporting because it can allow unaccountable accusations that damage reputations.
Witt questioned the policy’s confidentiality language and asked about the meaning of the sentence, “Suspected violations may be submitted on a confidential basis by the complainant.” Brade replied that the person receiving a report must protect a complainant’s identity where possible, but he also noted that in a small community some people may fear retaliation and therefore be reluctant to sign their names to complaints.
Chair Larry Roller echoed the concern that subconscious bias could affect outcomes even when retaliation is not intentional. Brade said he would draft language that, if the committee retains anonymous submissions, specifies that anonymous reports be sent directly to the County Administrator for review. He also said he would examine whether language from the county’s existing Grievance Policy could be merged with the Whistleblower provisions to create a single, unified policy.
Motion and next step: Supervisor Witt moved—and Chair Roller seconded—that the draft be tabled and that Brade revise the policy for countywide application; the committee approved the motion 3-0. Brade was tasked to bring a revised draft back to the Policy and Personnel Committee for further consideration. The meeting adjourned at 3:14 p.m.
