Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Traffic consultant and committee members warn of congestion risk at Route 110 entrance, question need for a third left-turn lane

Not specified in transcript · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Speakers raised safety and congestion concerns for eastbound Littleton Road traffic approaching a development entrance on Route 110, and a traffic consultant urged confirming whether a third left-turn lane would actually be required given past experience at Cornerstone Square.

A traffic consultant and committee members warned that eastbound Littleton Road traffic could back up at a proposed site entrance on Route 110 during the interval before the state widens Route 110, raising the prospect of congestion if a left-turn-only lane is not in place.

"I'm concerned about the 110 Littleton Road eastbound traffic coming up to where the left hand turn entrance into the site is," a committee member said, noting the concern applies to the period between reaching 80% occupancy and the planned state improvement.

The consultant, who said they served previously as the town's traffic consultant during the permitting of Cornerstone Square, urged officials to check whether a third left-turn lane would actually be needed: "We need to make sure we don't need the third left turn... I was the town's traffic consultant." The consultant argued that Cornerstone Square, despite projections, did not ultimately require a triple left-turn configuration.

A staff member echoed that historical observation: "So that triple left turn has not been needed still." Speakers recommended confirming projected volumes before requiring an additional left-turn lane or other geometric changes.

The transcript does not record a formal vote or directive on road geometry; the discussion focused on cautioning against prescriptive requirements without confirming traffic projections and timing of state roadway improvements.