Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County to reassign asset-manager position, approve modest office remodel and shift some custodial work to contracts

Davis County Commission · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff proposed moving a real property/asset-manager position from CED to Facilities, an in-house office remodel estimated at $18,000, a requested grade bump for a commercial-position hire, and using vetted contract custodial services after a long-time custodian's retirement.

Davis County staff told commissioners they plan to relocate a real-property/asset manager from Community and Economic Development (CED) to Facilities, ask for an in-house office remodel to prepare a suite for the role, and shift some custodial work to vetted contract services following a retirement.

The manager (Michael) outlined a proposed office reconfiguration inside the county suite to accommodate the asset manager and adjacent staff; the remodeling work would be constructed in-house and was budgeted at about $18,000 for labor and materials. Commissioners indicated general agreement and asked staff to coordinate IT and wiring needs.

Michael also asked the commission to approve a grade increase for a rewritten GIS/asset job description (a proposed two-grade bump from grade 22 to 24) to reflect desired commercial experience. Staff said the transfer of the incumbent vacancy and some one-time vacancy savings would cover initial costs and avoid a new appropriation.

On custodial staffing, staff said a long-time part-time custodian is retiring at month's end after accepting the early-retirement incentive; the county plans to replace some duties with contract custodial services that will be background-checked and meet BCI/BCS requirements. Staff estimated roughly $20,000 in ongoing savings from shifting some part-time, sensitive-area cleaning to vetted contractors while retaining three full-time custodians for deep cleaning needs.

Commissioners discussed trust and sensitivity concerns tied to contract custodians and asked staff to ensure appropriate background checks and door-locking procedures for sensitive areas. No formal vote was recorded; staff said funding would come from vacancy savings and budget transfers.