Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds staff guidance, votes not to allow painting of 326 West Wesatch masonry
Summary
The board voted to accept staff findings that painted masonry is inappropriate for the 14-unit building at 326 West Wesatch, citing maintenance and moisture concerns, despite the owner's argument that painting would address graffiti and improve tenant outcomes.
The Compliance and Technical Advisory Board voted Aug. 22 to accept staff’s recommendation that the exposed clay masonry on a 14-unit apartment at 326 West Wesatch remain unpainted.
Owner David Curry told the board his family-run company owns the building, houses mostly low-income tenants and wants a neutral off-white paint to cover graffiti and improve the building’s appearance. "If the place looks nice…people will feel better about where they live," Curry said, noting the building has about 14 units and he has owned it for roughly 20 years.
Staff and several commissioners warned that painting porous clay brick can trap moisture and accelerate deterioration, creating higher maintenance needs over time. Corey, a staff presenter, explained the historic-preservation technical guidance discourages painting masonry because of long-term maintenance and moisture risks. Ryan Reed of the Monte Vista Historical Association clarified that his earlier, personal email did not represent the committee’s formal position; the association supports the staff recommendation against painting.
After discussion about contributing status and long-term stewardship, a motion to accept staff findings carried on a roll-call vote. The board asked the owner to work further with staff on potential alternatives and follow-up actions.
The board’s action preserves the existing guideline-based approach and leaves open staff follow-up for maintenance or mitigation measures.
