Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and advocates demand accountability from CMCSS after March 27 bus crash
Summary
Multiple parents urged the Clarksville-Montgomery County School System board to provide accountability, better emergency communications and financial support after a March 27 school bus crash that killed two students; speakers said families experienced inconsistent outreach and requested clearer emergency funding and procedures.
Parents and community members addressed the Clarksville-Montgomery County School System board to demand clearer emergency procedures, better communications and concrete financial support after a March 27 school bus crash that killed two students and injured others.
"From the beginning, communication with affected family members were inaccurate," parent Xavier Lugo said, alleging many families learned about the crash from strangers, students or social media rather than the district's emergency system. Lugo said no affected family had received emergency medical assistance beyond the district's stated "$700,000 cap per incident," and described out-of-pocket bills—including "a $100,000" air-transport charge for his daughter.
Grandmother Diana McLean told the board she called the school eight times after the crash and was repeatedly hung up on before reaching the principal. "In the wake of tragedy, the school went silent and didn't communicate with us," McLean said, and urged the board to adopt an emergency plan to avoid similar communication breakdowns.
Parent Ashley Alathor said accountability, not "silence and damage control," is required and urged leadership change if the district will not act. Adam Ella Thorpe, another parent who addressed the board, said community trust has eroded and asked the board to prioritize transparency and student safety over public relations.
The speakers raised additional allegations about district responses: inconsistent accommodation for testing and, in at least one case, what parents described as retaliatory actions by a named staff member (Dr. Miller), which families characterized as "dismissive" and "intentionally harmful." No district official offered a detailed public rebuttal during the comment period; Dr. Linda Vitter later presented routine executive-limitation reports but did not provide immediate forum responses to the specific accounts in public comment.
The board took no formal action on the parents' requests during the meeting; members generally accepted routine consent items and executive-limitation reports. Parents said they expect the board to return with clear next steps, including a district emergency communication plan and clarification of financial support for injured students' medical needs.
The public comment period closed with speakers saying they will continue to press for investigations and accountability.
