Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant withdraws rezoning request for dumpster-storage on Gerald Plantation Road; commission signals application changes
Summary
At its May meeting, the Jones County Planning and Zoning Commission heard and accepted the withdrawal of a rezoning request by Gary Holmes for 20± acres at 1353 Gerald Plantation Road after Holmes said state guidance limited commercial vehicle storage and exposed him to large penalties; commissioners discussed clarifying application fields and vetting conservation easements.
At its May meeting the Jones County Planning and Zoning Commission heard from applicant Gary Holmes, who asked to withdraw a request to rezone roughly 20 acres at 1353 Gerald Plantation Road from AG‑1 (agricultural rural) to C‑2 (general commercial) with a conditional use to allow storage of roll‑off dumpsters.
Holmes told the commission he had consulted planning and zoning and the tax assessor and received a state letter limiting home‑based commercial operations to a single vehicle or dumpster without a variance. He said the penalties for breaching conservation/assessed‑use contracts could be steep — “from the penalties alone is almost a $100,000 back” — and that risk led him to retract the application. “Yes, ma’am … I wanna retract my application,” Holmes said as staff confirmed the item would be removed from the commission agenda and not appear before the board of commissioners on June 2.
Neighbors at the meeting welcomed the withdrawal. Bill Mitchell, who identified his address on a private drive off Gerald Plantation Road, told the commission, “Gerald Plantation should not have commercial,” and several residents said they expected code enforcement or environmental review to address lingering issues such as RVs and campers stored during the off season.
Commissioners used the episode to flag gaps in the rezoning application. One commissioner said the form is vague and does not clearly document when a rezoning would carve a small commercial parcel from larger acreage: “If you look at a map… it would go a long way to help us,” the commissioner said, urging an application field that prompts applicants to disclose whether a property is subject to a conservation easement or CUVA. Staff and commissioners agreed they could add advisement language or a certification to the form and will consult the county attorney on precise wording.
Staff confirmed the withdrawn application was removed from the agenda. Earlier in the meeting the commission approved the April minutes by motion and later moved to adjourn.
What’s next: The commission did not adopt any new application language in the meeting; members asked staff to consult the county attorney and bring possible changes back for consideration at a future meeting.
