Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council amends fence code to allow limited barbed wire in commercial/industrial areas and creates administrative variance process

Cleveland City Council · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved an amendment to the City's fence ordinance to permit barbed wire on commercial or industrial properties where the lowest strand is at least 6.5 feet above grade and added an administrative variance process limited to the fence article; council voted 7'to'0.

The Cleveland City Council approved changes to the city's fence ordinance that narrow the existing prohibition on certain fencing materials and create an administrative variance pathway specific to the fence article.

Emilio Navarro, director of community and economic development, explained the proposal grew from commercial property owners seeking flexibility to secure property. Navarro said the ordinance text would allow barbed wire "only to restrain livestock or as part of a fence on a property where the primary use is commercial or industrial and where the lowest strand of barbed wire is not less than 6 and 1 half feet above grade." He added the article also clarifies that local, state or federal entities may be exempt for public-safety reasons.

The amendment includes an administrative variance option limited to the fencing provisions so minor relief can be handled without the full board-of-adjustment process; staff emphasized the change is intended to streamline narrow technical requests and will not automatically apply to other ordinance sections. Council members asked staff to clarify drafting (for example, explicitly separating the livestock allowance and the commercial/industrial allowance and clarifying the 6.5-foot wording). A small drafting change was proposed during discussion to improve clarity.

After discussion, Councilman Julius Buckley moved to approve Item 11 with the recommended clarifying edits; the motion was seconded and carried 7'to'0. Staff said typical next steps will include updating ordinance text in final form and publishing the adopted language.

The change narrows the prohibition while establishing conditions aimed at balancing property security and neighborhood compatibility; staff noted the variance process will include notification and protest periods and that administrative relief will be limited in scope.