Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Aggregation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park Ridge weighs municipal aggregation with supplier offer that includes $36,000 civic contribution
Summary
The council heard a detailed presentation on municipal aggregation options, including an MC Squared 'rate-match' plan that would match ComEd rates and provide a $36,000 annual civic contribution; aldermen expressed concern about resident confusion and staff burden and asked staff to pursue community outreach and return with more information.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Aggregation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members spent a substantial portion of the meeting discussing municipal aggregation — a program that would allow Park Ridge to combine residential purchasing power and select an alternate electricity supplier.
Kevin Roos of the Sustainability Commission told the council municipal aggregation can be structured in multiple ways and described a common ‘‘rate‑match’’ offering through MC Squared that guarantees residents pay the same rate as ComEd while delivering a $36,000 civic contribution to the city. "It's effectively free money, for the city," Roos said, adding the contribution could be used to fund local sustainability projects.
Broker Adam Hoover explained logistics and customer outreach: letters are mailed to enrolled residents notifying them of the supplier change and the option to opt out. Hoover said opt-out and information calls are common and offered to help staff field questions. "Cons are when the letters go out, there's just confusion that comes out and residents will say, 'I got this letter. What does it mean?'" Hoover said.
Several council members voiced concern about the administrative burden and resident confusion. One alderperson recalled large staff time demands during a prior program and said, "the confusion can't be understated" and that shepherding the program required dedicated staff time. Another council member asked for comparative data from similar jurisdictions to understand likely transition friction.
Council members expressed enough interest to request that staff follow up: the item will be sent to the appropriate internal tracking list (P&R) for vetting and staff outreach, including community engagement to assess interest before advancing a formal ordinance. No vote on adoption was held at the meeting.
