Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District presents screening data showing K-2 literacy gains and uneven upper-grade growth
Summary
Doctor Hart presented FastBridge screening results showing notable K-2 literacy gains credited to UFLI and LETRS training, while the district flagged plateauing growth in some upper elementary and middle grades and outlined a curriculum-review and implementation-monitoring plan.
Doctor Hart, who presented the curriculum and instruction report, told the Lewis Central Community School District board that screening data show clear early-literacy gains and several areas that need sustained attention.
"The goal is always 80% — that means kids are performing at or above benchmark," Doctor Hart said, explaining the FastBridge fall-winter-spring reports and the difference between growth and maintenance metrics. He credited structured‑literacy work and local implementation of UFLI for sharp gains in kindergarten, where proficiency rose in the screening window from roughly 50% to about 70%.
The presentation noted assessment changes that affect year‑to‑year comparability: Titan Hill switched from CBM oral‑reading fluency to a broader reading assessment, so direct comparisons to past years are limited. Hart said the switch was made to reduce over‑identification and to measure vocabulary and comprehension more fully.
Board members pressed on transition years and teacher supports. One member asked whether the drop seen between fifth and seventh grades is a curriculum pacing issue or a broader problem. Hart answered that transition effects are common when students move to a new building and recommended analyzing staffing, experience level and implementation fidelity to identify root causes.
Hart emphasized the district is continuing a literacy curriculum review to identify a consistent, structured tier‑1 program that aligns with the state's shift away from balanced‑literacy models. "We're currently in the process of identifying a new curriculum to use," Hart said, adding that the district is also collecting implementation data so interventions target well‑defined gaps rather than only reacting at year-end.
The report also covered math screening results, which Hart described as largely stable districtwide (mid‑60s percent proficient across K‑8) with particular grade-level gains — for example, second grade increased from 58% to 71% proficiency in the spring. He recommended expanded focus on math instructional practices and continued professional development and PLC work to raise consistency.
The board and staff noted that FastBridge screening data intentionally over-identify students who may need support, while state Iowa assessment results — reported separately — tend to show higher proficiency levels. Doctor Hart characterized the screening data as "tough data" that surfaces underlying skills to prioritize instruction.
Next steps outlined to the board included finalizing a structured literacy adoption for K‑8, monitoring classroom-level implementation, expanding peer-to-peer observation and coaching, and reporting back to the board on changes in two years. The superintendent asked the board what questions they would like the administration to pursue as implementation continues.
The presentation closed with a mix of celebration for early-grade gains and a call for systematic work in implementation: Hart said the district is "seeing some promising growth" but needs to continue supporting teachers and monitoring fidelity to reach consistent benchmarks across all grades.
