Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Treatment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge approves step-down group home for defendant found not guilty by reason of insanity, warns on medication noncompliance
Summary
At a docket call in the 252nd District Court, the presiding judge said a step‑down group home is appropriate for a defendant previously found not guilty by reason of insanity, ordering strict medication compliance and warning that refusal could trigger a warrant and return to custody.
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Treatment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The presiding judge in the 252nd District Court told a defendant identified in court as "Mister Bell" that a less‑restrictive treatment setting — a small community group home — is appropriate and would be permitted, provided he complies with all rules and takes his medication as ordered. "If you miss your medication even just one time...there'll be an order sent out a warrant for you, and you'll be right back in jail," the judge said, stressing the importance of continuous medication and on‑site supervision.
The judge said she had inspected the proposed residence, described it as a regular neighborhood home with only two or three residents, and that staff there would be responsible for ensuring Bell takes prescribed medication. The judge said she would issue an order spelling out conditions for transfer and monitoring and that the paperwork would be completed "very soon."
Court records cited by the judge show Bell was previously found not guilty by reason of insanity on an aggravated assault charge involving a public servant and has been housed in a state hospital; the court found that ongoing treatment is still required but that a less‑restrictive environment is appropriate now.
The judge emphasized limits on Bell’s movement after release: he must live at the approved residence, observe curfews and follow staff directions; absences from the approved address would require prior permission. The court also instructed counsel and caseworkers to finalize the transfer logistics and sign the required paperwork before the move.
The court did not set a precise transfer date at the hearing; it said transfer and related paperwork would occur once administrative steps are complete, and that the judge would sign an order formalizing medication and supervision requirements.

