Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Service topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lewiston council resists resident's request to extend city water line into unincorporated parcel
Summary
Resident Kendall Crockett asked Lewiston to allow a ~1,700-foot water-main extension (about 760 feet outside city limits) to serve a proposed home; assistant public works director Brennan Hyer warned of reduced water quality, lower pressure, and inadequate fire protection, and multiple councilmembers said they would not approve the extension.
A Lewiston resident seeking service for a proposed rural home told the City Council on April 21 that he planned to extend the nearest water main about 1,700 feet to reach a parcel south of Oakdell Egg Farm on Conference Road, roughly 760 feet of which would lie outside Lewiston city limits.
Kendall Crockett asked the council whether it would approve moving forward with engineering expenses for the extension. Assistant Public Works Director Brennan Hyer advised the council that such a long, dead-end service line extending outside the city would likely reduce water quality, lower pressures in an area that already has sub-par pressure, and provide inadequate fire protection.
Councilmembers F. Bodily, Morrison, and Simper told Crockett they would not approve the extension because of those pressure and fire-protection concerns. The minutes record no alternative mitigation plan or approval; the issue remained a council-level decision point rather than an approved project.
Why it matters: extending municipal water service beyond the city's service area can create engineering, public-safety, and operational challenges. The council's stated objections center on water pressure and fire-protection adequacy, which affect both daily service and emergency response.
Clarifying details recorded in the minutes: the requested extension length was about 1,700 feet total, with approximately 760 feet outside Lewiston; staff warned of reduced pressure and water-quality risk for long, dead-end mains, and fire-protection limitations due to pressure concerns.
The council did not authorize the extension at the April 21 meeting; council members asked Crockett to await council approval before incurring additional engineering costs.
