Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Facility Options topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners revisit crisis-stabilization center vs. detox options amid staffing questions
Summary
Commissioners discussed converting a former detox facility into a crisis stabilization center; presenters said stabilization centers can handle co-occurring behavioral health needs with peers, LCSWs and QHPs and are easier to staff than a full medical detox requiring 24/7 physicians. Board asked staff to follow up with area hospitals about ER referral partnerships.
At the start of the work session, commissioners reopened discussion about options for a crisis stabilization center in a facility previously used for detox services.
Presenters and commissioners contrasted the two models. One board member said a crisis stabilization center can be staffed with peers, LCSWs and qualified mental-health professionals, and requires an on-call physician rather than 24/7 medical staffing. Another commissioner emphasized a continuing need for a dedicated detox facility because detox medically manages withdrawal and often requires continuous medical oversight.
Commissioners asked whether local hospitals would accept referrals from a stabilization center for patients needing medical care; presenters said they had not yet confirmed a formal partnership and agreed to follow up. Staff noted it has been more than a year since a local detox facility operated in Umatilla County.
No formal action was taken; staff will return with findings about hospital partnerships and regulatory or medical staffing implications for any conversion of the facility.
