Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sanitary Sewer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riviera Beach utility board approves sewer lining contracts while pressing staff for financing plan
Summary
The Utility Special District approved two sewer mainlining contracts totaling about $1.8 million (two separate items), while board members pressed staff for citywide replacement cost estimates and financing options after presentations on the system's age and the limits of existing bond capacity.
The City of Riviera Beach Utility Special District on May 20 approved multisegment sewer lining work and held a contentious debate about how to pay for wider system repairs.
The board voted unanimously to award a gravity sewer mainlining contract to Hinterland Group Inc. for work in the alley west of Broadway from West 20th to West 24th streets, authorizing payments not to exceed $368,578.25 from the USD wastewater renewal-and-replacement fund. Assistant Director Gallant told the board the line dates to 1964 "and is beginning to enter a failing state," and said a nondestructive lining would extend the pipe's life by 50 to 60 years.
Separately, the board approved a larger lining project in Lone Pine Estates to address failing metallic clay pipe; that work was authorized for up to $1,427,780 from the same renewal-and-replacement project. Gallant said lining is less disruptive and substantially cheaper than full replacement and will preserve road overlays the city plans to complete.
Not all consent-era procurement proposals sailed through. The board rejected (failed) a proposed $600,000 piggyback contract to preauthorize on-call emergency repair services after members raised concerns about an open purchase order of that size and wanted stronger checks and balances. "I don't like the idea of an open PO for $600,000 just in case," one councilmember said, urging more granular oversight for emergency expenditures.
Much of the evening's discussion focused on the scale of long-term needs and how to afford them. Board member Glenn Spiritus urged staff to bring a citywide estimate and a "worst-to-first" priority sequencing so the board can plan budget and capital improvements. District finance director Randy Sherman warned that while several earlier projects are funded, the USD is approaching bonding capacity and "we're going to be borrowing $440 million" for the overall water treatment and transmission program; he described SRF (State Revolving Fund) offers that could reduce borrowing costs and provide some principal forgiveness but said additional advocacy will be needed to secure loan forgiveness.
Board members repeatedly asked staff for near-term numbers to guide decisions ahead of the budget process. "This is just the tip of the iceberg," one member said after Gallant explained the project area is one of the worst sections the recent assessments identified.
What's next: Staff agreed to provide a multi-year plan, prioritized project lists and cost guesstimates for the board's upcoming budget deliberations. The failed $600,000 piggyback item will return later if the city retools vendor terms or provides additional oversight steps.
