Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Artificial Intelligence topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oxford schools pilot five-level AI scale and plan policy review

Oxford Area School District Board of School Directors · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff described a teacher-led pilot using a five-level FERSI scale (0—4) to manage acceptable AI use on assignments, with teacher training on AI literacy and a plan to send sample policies to the policy committee for the required three readings.

The Oxford Area School District on May 19 reported progress toward a district approach to generative artificial intelligence in classrooms. Mr. Mellinger, who is leading the district's AI committee work at the high school, described a five-level "FERSI" scale (0 to 4) that allows teachers to specify the degree to which students may use AI on a particular assignment and requires documentation of how students used the tools.

Mellinger said the approach focuses on transparency and academic integrity: teachers will indicate permitted AI level per assignment and students must disclose how they used AI and what they learned from it. The district is piloting AI literacy and bias-awareness training for teachers and soliciting student input on how AI affects learning and classroom expectations.

Board members asked whether a board member could serve on the district AI leadership team and how soon a formal district policy might be available. Administration said sample policies will be forwarded to the policy committee; because new policies require three readings, the district may use interim administrative guardrails and classroom-level permissions to allow measured AI use while the policy is being drafted and reviewed.

Next steps include bringing sample policy language to the policy committee, defining a timeline for readings, and exploring ways to involve board members in leadership or work sessions without creating a quorum problem for standing committees.