Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears concerns about new biology assessment and delayed results

Punxsutawney Area School District Board of Education · May 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A board member raised concerns about chemistry content on the district’s incoming biology assessment and the district explained results and cut scores will be delayed, requiring curriculum alignment during a transition year.

Board member Alan raised detailed concerns about changes to the state biology assessment and how those changes affect ninth-grade students, saying several “assessment boundary” items remove chemistry-level content that had previously been included. Alan read examples he said allayed his concerns, quoting that the new assessment “does not include interactions and functions at the reaction levels” and that it “does not include specific biochemical steps” in some areas.

A district official identified in the meeting as Doctor Gaston explained the new testing alignment will shift results timing: district representatives said biology results are expected in September, cut scores for the exam will not be established until at least September of the following year, and individualized student reports are likely to be released in January. Doctor Gaston and district staff said these timing changes create a transition period requiring the district to align curriculum and master schedules so students have appropriate seat time for trigger courses.

Board members highlighted the instructional implications: Doctor Gaston noted schedule adjustments are intended to increase seat time for students taking trigger courses (for example, providing a period and a half of instruction every other day) to allow for remediation and alignment with the new standards. Board members thanked Alan for researching assessment boundaries and asked district staff to keep the board informed as cut scores and release dates are finalized.

The discussion was informational; the board did not take a separate formal vote on the assessment items during the meeting.