Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheshire County officials brief Swansea selectboard on nursing home, EMS and grant work
Summary
County officials described Cheshire County services and finances—nursing‑home renovation, EMS operations and a grant strategy that the county says offsets property tax pressure—followed by a county finance director presentation showing how equalized valuations determine the county share of Swansea’s tax bill.
Officials from Cheshire County gave a detailed overview of county services, recent projects and grant activity to the Swansea selectboard.
A county presenter (S1) summarized major county functions and recent capital work, saying voters approved a $36 million bond for nursing home upgrades and that the county has been working to reduce double‑occupancy rooms and improve care. “When the nursing home was bonded, it was about a 12% increase of the county's overall tax to be raised at the time,” the presenter said, explaining why the project proceeded and how capacity and staffing remain constraints for expanding census.
Cheshire County Director of Finance Cheryl Tremblay (S9) provided the board with a three‑year tax breakdown and explained the Department of Revenue Administration’s equalized valuation process that determines each town’s share of county taxes. The presentation included the county’s total combined property valuation figure and the town of Swansea’s assessed share: $14.32 billion in county valuation with Swansea representing about $1.102 billion, or roughly 7.6957% of the county total, which is used to allocate the county portion of taxes.
Tremblay also described county efforts to seek grant funding for radio and tower upgrades and to support regional EMS and transportation partnerships (including a SmartRide contractor partnership), telling the board the county had identified roughly $19 million needed over five years for a rural health transformation and radio upgrade project and had already raised funds toward that goal.
Board members asked about staffing, traveler nurses and long‑term fiscal pressure from state decisions that shift costs to counties and towns; the county presenter said about 85.6% of county spending is statutorily driven, limiting local discretion, and urged local officials to ask state candidates how they will address downshifting and revenue changes.
The presentation was informational; the board did not take formal action on county items at the meeting.
