Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Litigation And Labor topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Diego City Council to go into closed session on multiple lawsuits and labor talks

San Diego City Council · May 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council recessed May 18 to meet in closed session on several existing litigations — including Sustainability Institute v. Donald J. Trump — and labor negotiations after public comment ranged from union demands for equity pay to criticism of sanctuary policies.

The San Diego City Council recessed into closed session May 18 to discuss multiple existing litigation matters and labor-negotiation strategy, the deputy city clerk announced.

Kevin Smith, deputy city clerk, read the closed-session items into the record, citing "conference with legal counsel, existing litigation pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)," and listing cases that include Sustainability Institute et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al. and several trip-and-fall claims against the city. He also read a labor-negotiation item under Government Code section 54957.6 concerning designated management team representatives.

The reading of closed-session items followed a public-comment period in which speakers raised concerns likely relevant to the items the council will consider in private. Callers and in-person commentators expressed a mix of views: some defended sanctuary policies and urged the city to defend them in court, while others blamed policy choices for funding shortfalls and urged fiscal reforms. The clerk confirmed the council would recess into closed session and reconvene at 2 p.m.; later the afternoon and evening sessions were adjourned and rescheduled due to unforeseen circumstances.

Why it matters: closed sessions give city officials and counsel an opportunity to discuss litigation strategy and labor bargaining positions away from public view; outcomes can affect city budgets, employee contracts and ongoing litigation. The council did not take public votes on the items and provided no public schedule for when the closed-session outcomes would be reported.

The council paused its public business for these private deliberations and said hearings will be rescheduled to a future date.