Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medical Freedom topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee defers bill that would bar 'medical intervention' discrimination after hours of testimony
Summary
After more than an hour of testimony and divided committee debate, the Senate Health and Welfare Committee voted 4–1 to defer House Bill 1041, which would prohibit denying access, employment or services based on an individual's medical-intervention status for healthy, asymptomatic people.
A Senate committee on May 13 deferred consideration of House Bill 1041 after extended debate over whether the proposed ban on discrimination tied to a person’s medical-intervention status would conflict with federal requirements and public-safety duties.
The bill’s sponsor, Representative Galley, told the committee the measure was meant to protect "individual freedom" and to prevent what he described as discriminatory treatment of people who decline medical interventions. "This is about maintaining personal freedom and removing the discriminatory nature of those who simply choose not to engage in any sort of medical intervention," he said.
Dr. Evelyn Griffin, the state’s surgeon general, testified in support and framed the proposal as an effort to restore public trust in health institutions. Griffin referenced a longitudinal JAMA analysis she said showed a drop in public trust in physicians and hospitals, saying the decline underscored the need for policies that ‘‘demonstrate fairness and respect for personal autonomy.’’
Opponents warned the measure, as written, would have sweeping unintended consequences for hospitals, schools and other institutions that must follow federal rules. Charlotte Holman, a pediatric neurologist, said weakening vaccine or infection-control requirements could risk outbreaks of previously controlled diseases and cited international experience with measles and other vaccine-preventable illnesses. "If we stop vaccinating, it's gonna come back," she told the panel.
Greg Waddell of the Louisiana Hospital Association said the bill’s language could limit hospitals’ ability to require personal protective equipment and other infection-control steps, and could also affect publicly funded hospitals subject to federal conditions. "This bill does not only apply to healthy asymptomatic patients," Waddell said, adding that several provisions in the draft could create operational difficulties for health-care facilities.
Senators pressed the sponsor on scope — whether children, schools, hospitals and privately owned businesses should be covered — and several amendments were proposed. One amendment offered by Senator Boudreau that would have reinserted entities removed from the draft was defeated on a roll call (two yes, three no). After additional debate, the committee voted to defer the bill until a later date by recorded tally, 4–1. Senator Boudreau made the motion to defer.
The committee’s chair said amendments and work between committee and stakeholders would be needed before the bill could move forward, and the proposal was left pending. The sponsor and committee members said additional drafting to address federal funding and narrow operational provisions would be their next step.
Where it stands: HB 1041 was deferred; no new enactment or vote on the underlying policy occurred during the session. Further drafting was suggested before the bill is rescheduled.
