Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tort Reform Aerospace topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves bill to let judges screen preempted aerospace claims early; senators seek tighter language
Summary
Senators reported House Bill 1250 favorably after extended questioning about whether the measure functions as an immunity grant and how broadly it applies; sponsors say it creates a front‑end probability screening for claims preempted by federal aviation law, not blanket immunity.
House Bill 1250, a substitute bill intended to reduce litigation burdens for federally licensed aerospace operations by allowing a judge to dismiss claims that have no probability of legal success because they are preempted by federal aviation law, was reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Judiciary A.
Sponsor testimony described the measure as an incorporation of an existing special‑motion‑to‑strike procedure (similar to language in Article 971 of the Code of Civil Procedure) targeted at claims that are foreclosed by express FAA preemption. The sponsor and supporting staff repeatedly said the bill does not confer liability immunity for actionable personal‑injury claims that fall outside the scope of federal preemption and noted that appellate review remains available after an adverse district‑court decision.
Committee members pressed the sponsor on whether the bill would reach claims involving on‑site contractors, suppliers or overflight‑related incidents and whether it might be applied to personal‑injury events such as an accident during a launch. Senators asked for examples and requested clearer statutory definitions of what counts as an "aerospace flight entity," how "probability of success" should be measured, and which venues would apply. The sponsor repeatedly stressed intent to cover FAA‑licensed, federally regulated activities and offered to tighten the draft language to avoid unintended coverage for unrelated events.
Supporters from regional economic‑development organizations (GNO Inc., 1 Acadiana) were recorded as present and supportive. After extended discussion and the promise of clarifying edits, the committee reported the bill favorably to the Senate.
