Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Westchester board reviews draft energy plan; consultant and residents stress safety, public input

Village of Westchester Board of Trustees · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultant Ted Redmond presented a draft community energy plan funded by a block grant that outlines 12 strategies and 62 actions through 2040; the board and residents were urged to prioritize low-cost bike-safety measures and to submit public comments by April 2 ahead of an April 28 final review.

Ted Redmond of Pale Blue Dot presented a draft Westchester energy plan to the Village Board on March 24, describing a process built on a greenhouse-gas inventory, a community renewable-energy potential study, and a facilities energy review. Redmond said the plan is funded by a block grant and “does not commit the village to any action or expenditure” but provides a long-term roadmap to inform future decisions.

Redmond outlined the plan’s structure: two sectors (buildings and transportation), 12 strategies and a menu of 62 actions the village could implement opportunistically through 2040. He said baseline analysis comparing 2020 and 2024 data shows a reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions, which he attributed primarily to a cleaner regional electric grid and, to a lesser extent, greater adoption of electric vehicles. When asked about units, Redmond clarified the inventory is reported in metric tons of greenhouse gas.

The consultant provided order-of-magnitude estimates for facility solar potential and said the plan includes priority sites (none rated “priority 1” for immediate deployment but several “priority 2” sites) with illustrative lifetime cost savings. Redmond said successful implementation could cumulatively save about 4,400,000 kilowatt-hours by 2040, reduce approximately 1,900,000 therms of gas use, avoid over 460,000 metric tons of emissions, and yield roughly $66 million in community-wide savings after accounting for investments; he noted those figures are illustrative and detailed in the plan appendix.

Village Manager Barry emphasized the draft status of the plan and invited public review and comment. He said adoption of a formal plan is required to comply with the grant funding and clarified that any specific expenditures would still require separate board approval. The board and staff scheduled a public input session for March 25 (6–7:30 p.m.) and will keep the comment portal open through April 2; staff expects to return a revised final draft to the board on April 28.

During public comment, members of the Westchester Bike Group asked the board to prioritize low-cost safety improvements such as paint-to-pavement bike demarcation on Viking and other small-scale changes that would improve walking and biking safety without large expenditures. The board encouraged residents to attend the town-hall-style session and to submit questions and feedback online.

Next steps: the draft is available online and open for comment through April 2; staff will gather public input, work with the consultant to revise the plan, and present a final draft to the board on or before April 28.