Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tif 2 Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winfield hails unanimous appellate court ruling in TIF 2 lawsuit
Summary
Village Attorney David Freeman told trustees an appellate court on Feb. 4 unanimously upheld the circuit court's summary-judgment ruling in favor of Winfield on the TIF 2 litigation; school districts have 35 days to seek Supreme Court review. Trustees said the decision clears a major legal hurdle for town-center plans that include a new village hall and police facility.
Get email alerts on the Tif 2 Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Winfield Village Board was told on Feb. 19 that the appellate court unanimously upheld the circuit court's summary-judgment ruling in favor of the village in the long-running TIF 2 litigation.
"The appellate court unanimously ruled in favor of the village with regard to the TIF 2 litigation," Village Attorney David Freeman said. Freeman told the board the opinion, issued Feb. 4, concluded the circuit court judge properly granted summary judgment because the parties agreed there were no material facts in dispute, leaving only questions of law for the court to decide.
Freeman said the appellate opinion addressed the substantive challenges raised by the school districts and rejected them on every point. "It's very clear from the opinion of the appellate court justices that the village was right and took proper steps with regard to the formation of TIF 2," he said.
Village President Sorgatz urged calm and urged the school boards involved to read the written opinion before taking further steps. "I would hope that cooler heads prevail and that we all can work together for the betterment of this community," Sorgatz said.
Trustees and staff used the discussion to clarify what the ruling means for the village's plans. Board members noted that prior advisory referendum questions about using parking-deck revenues to fund municipal facilities were nonbinding and intended only to guide officials. One trustee observed that some public messaging had conflated separate issues. "There were multiple questions; they're advisory in nature just to give us input from the village," a trustee said.
The board did not record a new formal action tied to the ruling at the meeting. Freeman said the school districts have 35 days under court rules to seek further review in the Illinois Supreme Court; if they do not, the village can proceed with planning and implementation steps tied to TIF 2.
