Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows staff-tutoring restriction after heated debate, approves policy change 6–1
Summary
Trustees debated a proposed removal of a restriction on paid tutoring by classroom teachers; after a protracted exchange about conflicts of interest and student access the board approved revisions to Policy 3.231 on outside activities by a 6–1 vote.
Get email alerts on the Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On fourth reading the board considered a revision to Policy 3.231 (Outside Activities of Staff) that would remove a section restricting classroom teachers from accepting paid tutoring from students they currently instruct. Member Kristen (speaking against the change) argued the restriction protects against favoritism and potential litigation; other trustees and administrators argued eliminating the restriction preserves student access to trusted teachers and respects teachers’ rights as private citizens to provide services outside contracted time.
Assistant superintendents advised that privately arranged tutoring between teachers and families remains a private agreement and is not district-sanctioned; the board discussed safeguards and the need to monitor for conflicts without creating inequitable student access barriers. After discussion the motion to approve the revised policy passed 6–1; the minutes record Trustee Brunton as the dissenting vote (concerned about leaving teachers vulnerable to liability and the appearance of impropriety).
The revised policy will be reflected in the district policy manual and administrative guidelines will be used to clarify expectations and reporting mechanisms for staff who provide outside services. Trustees asked administration to provide guidance for building leaders and to consider communications to families explaining the district’s stance and oversight expectations.
What’s next: Administrative guidelines and technical edits were requested; the board will monitor any unintended consequences and revisit the policy if needed.

