Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee reviews modified housing accelerator, loan tools in S.328
Summary
The Senate Economic Development, Housing & General Affairs committee heard presenters describe key changes to S.328, including a reinstated but permissive housing accelerator, codified revolving-loan language, a first bond-bank loan of roughly $2 million, and outstanding agency capacity and appropriation questions for DHCD.
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair Mark Mahoney and staff briefed the Senate Economic Development, Housing & General Affairs committee on S.328, summarizing edits and why some planning provisions were removed. Mahoney said the bill now includes a reinstated housing accelerator but with permissive language that allows, rather than requires, off-site or modular construction programs.
Mahoney described the accelerator’s goal as aggregating small rural projects into larger modular orders to lower costs and stabilize contractors’ workloads. "The objective of this off‑site accelerator is to build more housing units, cheaper and cheaper in our rural communities," he said, adding the program is intended to let small developers combine orders so a factory could produce, for example, 40 units instead of isolated three- or four-unit projects.
On financing, Mahoney said technical edits codify a revolving loan fund requested by BHMA and noted a recent action by the bond bank: under prior accounting authorization the bond bank made its first small-project loan yesterday, about $2,000,000. Mahoney explained the treasurer manages risk by lending through intermediaries such as VHFA or VHCD rather than directly to developers. "The treasurer won't put the state's money at risk on the development," he said, describing a structure of below‑market lending plus guarantees.
Committee members raised concerns about private‑equity purchases of single‑family homes and the risk they pose to renters. A committee member said strong landlord‑tenant protections are the most effective defense against displacement; Mahoney noted S.328 asks for a report and that DHCD has agreed to work on it. The bill also would direct a resource center—hosted via the secretary of state's office or DHCD—to publish basic HOA and subdivision law information online.
Cameron, presenting survey data from the Homes for All small‑scale developer program, told the committee the program had surveyed 272 participants (about half from rural communities). Roughly 100 respondents said financing is a barrier and about 60 cited a shortage of trade professionals relevant to off‑site modular construction, suggesting workforce capacity is a constraint.
Mahoney acknowledged agency concerns about appropriation and operational capacity. He said language was reworked so the program is permissive and contemplates a request for information to gauge developer interest; he also said agency staff including Alex Bruce reviewed the changes and were comfortable with the revisions. Committee staff flagged that some municipal planning provisions are being handled in the Senate Natural Resources committee and recommended continued intercommittee coordination.
No formal motions or votes were recorded during the briefing. Committee members agreed to continue work on S.328, coordinate with Natural Resources where planning provisions overlap, and follow up with agency staff on capacity and appropriation questions.

