Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council raises coordination concerns but offers no objection to Teton Village Area 2 amendments
Summary
Planning staff and applicants described text amendments to the Teton Village Area 2 master plan that change transit-center triggers, reorganize public‑facility exactions, and preserve flexibility on transit‑center timing; council directed staff to forward comments to the county emphasizing continued stakeholder coordination.
Jackson — Councilors reviewed proposed text amendments to the Teton Village Area 2 master plan and agreed to send the planning commission’s and staff’s comments to the Board of County Commissioners, while urging continued coordination among stakeholders on the future transit center location.
Planning staff presented four principal changes: modifying the trigger for building a transit center so it is tied to a transportation‑demand‑management plan rather than specific certificates of occupancy or a designated parcel; relocating and combining some public‑facility exactions (moving the visitor center allocation to the future transit center site while leaving the sheriff’s substation in place); cleaning up inconsistent master‑plan language and use tables; and preserving flexibility so the applicant is not forced to commit to a specific transit‑center location or timeline prematurely.
Chandler Wyndham, Teton County senior planner, told council the master plan already contemplates a collaborative sketch‑plan process and that the Board of County Commissioners would make final location decisions. Planning staff noted that earlier applicant language that would have tied the exaction to specific parcels (parcels L and M) was withdrawn and that the current amendment does not designate a specific property for a transit center.
Council discussion centered on local access and user experience: some councilors said the town would prefer the transit center to remain within reasonable walking distance of current skier drop‑off points and emphasized keeping Jackson staff and local stakeholders involved. Council directed staff to forward a message of "no objection" to the county for the proposed amendments while emphasizing the importance of continued coordination among stakeholders regarding future transit center planning. The motion passed unanimously.
Background: The amendments were forwarded from the town planning commission, which voted unanimously to send its comments. Staff said the proposed edits were largely procedural clarifications and cleanups, but the transit‑center trigger and exactions raised questions among stakeholders.
What happens next: Staff will forward the council—s comments to Teton County and maintain coordination on future transit‑center planning roles and timelines.
