Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Entertainment Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves entertainment-district bill after debate over local control and 'airplane bottle' preemption
Summary
The Senate passed House Bill 2057 to designate two additional entertainment districts; a floor amendment to preempt targeted local bans on small packaged alcohol (the "airplane bottle" preemption) drew contested debate before the sponsor withdrew it. Kansas City and St. Louis-area senators pressed concerns about local authority and public safety.
The Missouri Senate on May 11 passed the house committee substitute for House Bill 2057, a bill that designates two additional entertainment districts (the Lake of the Ozarks area and a downtown Chesterfield district in St. Louis County).
Senators engaged in extended floor colloquy after the sponsor, who identified himself on the floor as the senator from the fifteenth, said she would offer an amendment commonly called the "airplane bottle" amendment aimed at preempting narrowly targeted local prohibitions on certain packaged alcohol. "So again, what this amendment is attempting to do is to preempt or stop very local, targeted laws that say just these pockets of folks can sell certain packaged alcohol and others can't," the sponsor said while explaining the amendment.
Senators from Kansas City and St. Louis-area districts objected, arguing that local governments had used narrow ordinances to address concentrated public-safety problems. A senator from the ninth (representing parts of Kansas City) described the Kansas City ordinance as a surgical intervention for neighborhoods with chronic public-safety problems and objected to the state overriding local choices: "Who the heck are we to tell the city of Kansas City what to do when the voters and the people of Kansas City have spoken?" she asked.
The sponsor ultimately withdrew the amendment after floor discussion; the main bill then moved forward and passed on third reading (journal records the final tally as 29 ayes and 1 no). The sponsor said the underlying measure simply authorizes entertainment-district designations that allow localities to implement walkable alcohol-permitted areas under state statute.
Why it matters: the statute governs how municipalities may create entertainment districts where open-container rules and local alcohol service practices are tailored for economic development and downtown activation. The floor debate highlighted tension between statewide preemption proposals and local home-rule authority; senators urged continued consultation with municipal leaders on any preemption proposals.
