Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the AI Legislation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sponsor says Senate passed AI guardrails 20–10; bill failed in House committee 0–11

Missouri State Senate · May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sponsor recounted that a Senate AI guardrail bill passed 20–10 but then died in a House committee vote reported as 0–11. He criticized behind‑the‑scenes lobbying and said the legislation aimed to protect jobs, children and campaigns while preserving innovation.

A sponsor on the floor described the arc of a Senate AI guardrail bill that the sponsor said the Senate approved 20–10 but that later stalled in the House committee. The sponsor summarized the bill’s objectives—protecting jobs, limiting harms to children from unsupervised chatbots, and setting guardrails for political use of AI—then recounted his efforts to shepherd the bill and his frustration at the committee defeat in the lower chamber.

"We passed it here 20 to 10," the sponsor said on the Senate floor, describing sustained outreach that included engagement with federal officials and national organizations. He said the measure drew opposition from groups including Americans for Prosperity and the Missouri Chamber of Commerce, which he said did not consult with him before opposing the bill. He told colleagues the House committee vote failed 0–11 (as announced on the floor) and criticized what he described as coordinated background work to block the measure.

Senators questioned whether the Senate should continue to press similar proposals and asked about next steps. The sponsor suggested he would continue efforts to improve the bill and to seek meetings with colleagues to address concerns. No final floor motion to override or recall the matter appears in this portion of the transcript; the sponsor framed the episode as an example of how behind‑the‑scenes lobbying and procedural dynamics can halt legislation after a favorable Senate vote.