Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Rate Case topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oakland County votes to intervene in DTE rate case, requests counsel cost estimate
Summary
The Oakland County Board of Commissioners voted 7-0 to authorize the county to intervene before the Michigan Public Service Commission to challenge proposed DTE Energy rate increases, after county counsel described a tight timeline and outside-counsel fees; commissioners asked for a budget estimate and finance-committee review.
Oakland County commissioners voted unanimously to authorize the county to intervene in proceedings before the Michigan Public Service Commission over proposed rate increases by DTE Electric Company.
Chair Woodward introduced the item and said the action would let Oakland County seek discovery into DTE’s operations and finances to press for affordability, reliability and resiliency for county ratepayers. "We have the ability to conduct discovery of DTE's operations, their finances, how they spend their money to challenge the need for the rate increase," a county attorney explained during the meeting.
The board heard from a county attorney who said the county has retained outside counsel, Sean Gallagher, to lead the effort. The attorney described utility-rate litigation as a specialized area with a short timeline and noted that the county would gain the procedural rights of an intervenor, including the ability to review DTE filings and take discovery.
Deputy County Executive Megan Selleck told the board the county executive shared concerns about rising energy costs but cautioned that formal intervention can be expensive. "The county executive consulted with the attorney general this morning, who doesn't believe that more lawyers are needed and that the board can be helpful in other ways," Selleck said, urging the board to weigh costs and expected outcomes.
In response, county counsel said outside counsel was retained because the work requires specialized regulatory experience and that corporation counsel may not have the necessary expertise within the board's tight timeline (about eight months to resolution). Counsel also provided typical billing ranges for the retained firm: legal assistant and law-clerk rates starting near $130 per hour and senior-attorney rates up to $450 per hour; the lawyer expected the primary attorney assigned to the case would bill at about $450 per hour.
Several commissioners voiced support for intervening as a way to protect county interests. Commissioner Hawkins said standing together would demonstrate a united front against the increase. Commissioner Gershwin asked staff to request an estimated total budget from outside counsel and suggested considering a cap on spending. County counsel agreed to ask outside counsel for a projected start-to-finish estimate and to bring that estimate to the finance committee for review.
The board then voted on the resolution to authorize the county to intervene in the DTE rate case. The clerk announced "7 yeas and 0 nays," and the motion passed.
Votes at a glance - Agenda item 5A — Motion to authorize Oakland County to intervene in Michigan Public Service Commission proceedings regarding proposed DTE Electric Company rate increases. Mover: Woodward. Seconder: Commissioner Hoffman. Outcome: Approved; tally announced 7 yeas, 0 nays. Individual roll-call votes were not specified in the transcript.
What happens next County counsel will request a budget estimate from outside counsel and present that estimate to the finance committee. The public service commission process may proceed through settlements or a formal docketed proceeding; counsel advised the board the timeline to a final decision could span several months.
