Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners approve permanent flashing speed signs for Hannaford after debate over speed bumps and rumble strips

Griggs County Commission · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended discussion about heavy truck traffic, speed bumps and road maintenance, the Griggs County Commission voted to install permanent-powered flashing speed-limit signs in Hannaford to improve driver awareness; commissioners asked staff to confirm power access and follow up on effectiveness.

The Griggs County Commission voted to install permanent-powered flashing speed-limit signs in Hannaford after a lengthy discussion about traffic safety, maintenance and cost. The motion, introduced during the meeting, passed in a roll-call vote with all five commissioners voting aye.

Why it matters: Residents and officials described recurring safety risks on the town street used by heavy agricultural trucks, farm equipment and elevator traffic. Commissioners said they want a low-maintenance, visible measure to remind drivers to slow down near the church, park and two pedestrian crossings.

Meeting debate and evidence: County staff and local participants presented several options and vendor quotes. One staff member and an agency official reviewed vendor pricing: rumble-strip kits ranged from about $2,615 to $5,759 for six 12-foot sets; solar-powered flashing speed signs were quoted at about $3,645 each (LED Lighting Solutions), while an AC-powered option from Traffic Logic was quoted at about $4,456. A business representative said CHS advises its drivers to use the bypass but cannot require compliance. A commissioner who has driven many rural towns cautioned that speed bumps can damage trailer equipment and the roadway under heavy loads and said flashing signs ‘‘absolutely’’ won’t solve everything but will make drivers more aware.

Decision: The board instructed staff to pursue permanent-powered flashing signs (tapping into existing light-pole service where feasible), to check pole power access with the utility Otter Tail and to return with installation details and a follow-up plan to evaluate whether the signs reduce speeds. The motion was moved by Scott and seconded; the board carried it by roll call (Rod, Scott, Josh, Lauren and Stephanie voting aye).

Implementation and next steps: Commissioners asked staff to confirm exact vendor, wiring/trenching needs, ongoing electricity costs and placement (closer to the church/park). They also discussed short-term enforcement: increased sheriff presence once in a while and tracking whether the signs reduce speeding. If flashing signs do not sufficiently slow traffic, commissioners said they could consider additional measures such as parking restrictions or stop signs.

Quotes tied to the record: One commissioner described the signs’ effect this way: ‘‘It’s not gonna solve everything, but it makes you very aware,’’ and staff noted that tapping into a light pole avoids battery maintenance and the sign failing during low sun in winter.

The commission asked that staff return with a site-specific plan and cost estimate at a future meeting so the board can track results and consider any further traffic-calming steps.