Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges full hearing on parcel‑specific South Naples rezoning

Collier County Board of County Commissioners · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident told the Collier County Board that a combined parcel‑specific rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment for a project named 'South Naples Toy Storage' creates an isolated, one‑parcel subdistrict and urged removing the item from the summary agenda so it can receive full scrutiny.

A resident asked commissioners on Feb. 10 to remove a proposed parcel‑specific rezone and comprehensive plan amendment for the project referred to as "South Naples Toy Storage" from the summary agenda and give it a full hearing.

Cody Davis, who gave his address to the board, said his concerns were procedural rather than personal to the applicant. He argued the item combines a parcel‑specific commercial planned‑unit development rezoning with a parcel‑specific growth‑management plan amendment that would create a new subdistrict limited to a single parcel and single use. “This is the definition of an isolated district,” Davis said, and he urged that the project receive heightened scrutiny and not be treated as a summary item.

Davis reviewed staff criteria and told the board he found the staff report’s logic circular: safeguards were being marked as satisfied only if the board first agreed to amend the comprehensive plan. He said that when the growth management plan must be amended parcel by parcel to legalize a use otherwise not allowed, that constitutes a special entitlement rather than generally applicable public policy.

Several commissioners responded on record, thanking the resident for attending and describing the staff and commissioner review process. Commissioners said private property owners are entitled to pursue rezones under the county’s processes and that commissioners weigh public concerns against property‑owner rights. One commissioner encouraged citizens to participate in the formal process and noted that parcel‑specific requests are part of long‑standing land‑use procedures.

The item as referenced in public comment was continued to a later meeting for full consideration; the board did not take final action on the rezoning at this meeting.