Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 2001 N Flagler topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board unanimously approves 90‑unit North Flagler project and related variances
Summary
The board approved a level‑3 special review and associated variances for a 90‑unit, podium‑and‑tower project at 2001 N. Flagler (case 2025), including incentives to reach the 306‑foot core‑1 height and conceptual public art/landscaping on the ground floor.
The West Palm Beach Planning Board on May 19 unanimously recommended approval of a 90‑unit mixed‑use residential project at 2001 N. Flagler Drive (planning board case 2025), granting requested variances and level‑3 special‑review approval subject to staff conditions.
What the board approved: The application proposes a five‑story podium with 22 stories above (27 floors total) yielding 90 units and 185 structured parking stalls. The developer elected to use municipal incentives to reach a 306‑foot maximum height for Core 1 of the Curry Mixed‑Use District. The team requested four variances: ground‑floor active use along some frontages, upper‑floor garage liner percentage, a limited balcony encroachment to increase usable balcony depth by 1.5 feet, and limited landscaping concessions along a public alley to accommodate loading and utilities.
Design and mitigation: The design places the primary pedestrian‑oriented uses and lobby on Flagler Drive; the team described an open, glazed public art and landscaping display in lieu of a fully enclosed active use along the secondary street frontage, intended to encourage street life and help meet the intent of liner requirements. The project includes roughly $4.9 million in incentive payments — approximately $3.75 million to Curry Park improvements and $1.125 million to the city's transit/mobility fund — as part of the incentive menu used to justify the taller tower.
Staff and board rationale: Planning staff found the project complies with level‑3 special‑review standards and recommended approval with conditions. Board members praised the ground‑floor public realm treatment and the creative approach to meeting the intent of active ground‑floor uses. The board voted unanimously to grant the variances and to recommend approval of the level‑3 review, subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Next steps: The recommendation will advance to the City Commission for final action; conditions attached by staff will be incorporated into the commission packet.
