Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press staff for documentation after concerns that Booth may both monitor and administer small‑business contract
Summary
Commissioners raised conflict‑of‑interest concerns when staff proposed a Booth contract amendment to administer the county small‑business program while Booth already performs monitoring work. Staff said a different Booth team would handle the small‑business work and promised to provide documentation explaining why no conflict exists; commissioners withheld a vote until the information is provided.
County staff presented an amendment to a Booth management consultant contract to add administration of the small‑business program. Commissioner Sank and others questioned whether the same company that monitors federal expenditures should also administer the program, asking, "Are we concerned... any conflict of interest considering that they are already monitoring the... expenditures?" (speaker Sank).
Staff replied the amendment would be implemented by a separate Booth team and that paperwork had been provided earlier explaining why staff believed there was no conflict. Commissioner Sank countered that it is "the same company" and said that the potential for conflict remains regardless of internal staffing. Staff agreed to re‑send the conflict‑of‑interest materials and to meet with commissioners for clarification; commissioners asked that the item be held off the formal vote until questions are answered.
The discussion focused on process and transparency rather than a final decision: staff promised to provide the documentation and to convene a follow‑up meeting; commissioners indicated they would not vote on the amendment in two weeks unless outstanding questions have been resolved.
