Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oldsmar council backs phased funding approach for 14‑year stormwater master plan
Summary
After a detailed presentation from consultants, Oldsmar council signaled consensus for a phased funding approach—an initial one‑time increase of roughly 37% to the stormwater fee with a 3% annual CPI escalation thereafter—so the city can begin prioritized drainage and water‑quality projects without exhausting reserves.
Oldsmar’s City Council on May 19 reviewed a 14‑year stormwater master plan that maps 14 prioritized projects for flood reduction and water‑quality improvements and indicated support for a phased funding approach.
Jones Edmunds consultant Tracy Dayton and Public Works Director Andy Greenwood summarized hydrology and hydraulics updates, described a level‑of‑service analysis and presented conceptual projects ranked by benefit‑cost ratio. The work includes upsizing critical outfalls, constructing detention ponds for water quality, and targeted conveyance projects in areas with chronic flooding.
“Money today is not gonna be worth what it is tomorrow,” consultant Tracy Dayton told the council, urging a funding mechanism tied to recurring increases so projects do not become more expensive to implement later. The presentation included an implementation schedule, project cost estimates escalated at 3% per year and a benefit‑cost analysis used to sequence work.
City staff and the consultant presented four funding scenarios: (1) no fee increase (relying on reserves until shortfalls appear), (2) CPI‑tied annual increases, (3) a single one‑time 60% increase to fully fund the program, and (4) a hybrid option of a 37% one‑time increase followed by an annual 3% CPI adjustment. Council members debated tradeoffs between immediate, larger funding and spreading the cost over time.
Several council members said they favored the hybrid approach because it spreads rate effects while advancing projects sooner. “I’m inclined to agree to the 37% increase in year 1 and then 3% each year after,” one member said during the discussion. Council members also asked staff to continue pursuing grants and to coordinate stormwater projects with other planned infrastructure work to avoid re‑digging streets.
The council did not adopt a formal ordinance at the meeting; members gave staff direction to return with formal resolutions and rate proposals reflecting the chosen scenario. Staff emphasized the plan does not commit the city to bond or debt financing and that the recommended approach leaves flexibility to pause or adjust annual increases if economic conditions warrant.
Next steps: staff will prepare formal ordinance(s) and rate analyses for future council consideration and will continue to pursue external grant opportunities for high‑cost trunk projects.
