Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wastewater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City wastewater staff warn wipes and debris are clogging pumps, cite large repair costs
Summary
City wastewater staff warned residents not to flush wipes and other debris, showed examples found in drying beds and said those blockages damage pumps; a speaker in the meeting described multi-thousand-dollar equipment replacements and an asserted aggregate cost figure.
City wastewater staff used the Parks & Recreation meeting to urge residents to stop flushing wipes and other nonflushable items after showing material recovered in the drying bed and warning that those materials damage pumps and drive repair costs.
"There are only three things that should be disposed of in the sewer system: 1, human waste. 2, toilet paper. And 3, gray water," said John Trequato of the City of Bullhead City's wastewater division. He described finding baby wipes, plastic bags, razor blades, pencils, candy wrappers, pieces of styrofoam and hundreds of tampon applicators in system equipment.
Trequato said the debris plugs pumps and requires labor to remove and, when pumps burn up, the city sometimes must use outside contractors. In the presentation he stated a minimum aggregate figure of "$4,050,000 dollars" as a cost that can be avoided by not flushing these items. The meeting also included a separate comment that the city has replaced two or three pumps at roughly $40,000 each in earlier years; that cost example was presented as meeting commentary.
Why this matters: City staff said clogged pumps mean extra labor, equipment removal and potential contracting costs; those repairs can affect sewer operations and taxpayer expense. Staff urged residents to discard wipes and other nonflushable items in the trash and to follow city guidance.
What officials advised: Trequato recommended disposing only human waste, toilet paper and gray water in the sewer system and said the drying bed contents illustrated the scale of the problem. Residents with questions were directed to the city's utilities office in the meeting.
Clarification and caveats: The $4,050,000 figure and the $40,000-per-pump example were presented in the meeting; the city did not provide supporting budget documentation during this presentation. The meeting transcript contains those statements as claims; the reported amounts should be confirmed with city finance or wastewater staff for accounting details.
