Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ishpeming finance director warns of shrinking general fund; council weighs a millage option

Ishpeming City Council · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City finance staff presented April financials showing declining general, major and local-streets funds and outlined options including a hypothetical 2.5‑mill ballot proposal; council agreed to public open houses and to prepare budgets with and without a millage.

City staff told the council the city's general fund and street-maintenance accounts are shrinking and that winter plowing costs have pushed major and local-streets budgets beyond anticipated appropriations.

The finance director presented the April 30, 2026 financial excerpt and said the general fund recorded $105,000 in tax revenue for April while noting large expenditures for pension-bond debt service. The director said major streets had collected $79,000 in gas-and-weight taxes in April but faced heavy winter maintenance costs; local streets had expended about 140% of its plowing budget year to date and had a smaller reserve. The public-improvement fund includes roughly $500,000 in state FEMA Section 19 grant money, some of which subsidized the 3rd Street storm-sewer work.

Staff outlined five broad options to respond to the fiscal stress: reduce wages/benefits, cut staffing, cut services, pursue a millage, or pursue development to expand the tax base. As an illustrative example, staff projected a 2.5‑mill general fund increase would raise roughly $399,000 communitywide (net of retiring the fire-equipment millage), translating to an estimated $90 annual increase for a typical primary residence in the city's example. Staff emphasized the 2.5 number was a hypothetical figure for discussion, not a formal recommendation.

Councilors expressed concern that a 2.5‑mill increase might not be sufficient for long-term needs and asked staff to provide numbers for a 3‑mill scenario. Members also discussed alternatives to a millage, including adjusting user fees (the finance director pointed to cemetery rates as an example), pursuing grant-matched debt for roadway projects, and asking townships that use the library to contribute more. Staff said open houses are scheduled to collect resident input and that, if a millage is put on the ballot, staff would prepare two budget scenarios (with and without the millage).

At the meeting the council voted to adopt Resolution 13-2026 to strike the fire-equipment millage from the levy and to apply surplus funds to pay down other general-obligation debt; that measure passed by voice vote. Council also tabled first-quarter budget amendments pending full-council consideration and additional information.