Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Corrections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County hears jail assessment: new facility options, cost estimates and plans for town halls ahead of Nov. 2026 ballot

Gage County Board of Supervisors · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultants told the Gage County Board on Feb. 18 that a new off-site jail would likely require 5–7 acres and a 50,000–55,000 sq. ft. facility with construction costs estimated at $600–$650 per square foot; the county scheduled town-hall meetings and an online survey as part of planning for a possible ballot question in November 2026.

The Gage County Board of Supervisors received an update Feb. 18 from Davis Design on preliminary assessments of the county jail and possible bond-financed replacement options.

Christian Petrick of Davis Design presented building plan options that considered renovating the current site versus constructing a new off-site facility. Petrick said planners estimate construction costs of roughly $600 to $650 per square foot and that an off-site facility to house required jail functions would likely require 5–7 acres for a 50,000–55,000 square-foot building. He also noted that the county’s current facility operates under a grandfather clause and could become non-operational, requiring out-of-county placement of inmates while a short-term intake and processing space would still be necessary.

The board scheduled town-hall informational meetings at 7:00 p.m. on March 4 and March 6 at the Beatrice High School Hevelone Center and directed staff to create an online survey and follow-up meetings to gather public feedback. Officials said the goal is to bring the issue to the ballot in the Nov. 2026 general election, and that the planning work will include a cost analysis comparing “build” and “no-build” options, financing scenarios and public preferences.

Vice Chairman Emily M. Haxby and Supervisor Gary Lytle emphasized the importance of public input in shaping a final plan and noted that surrounding counties face similar aging facility issues. The presentation also pointed out ancillary functions housed at the current facility — investigator offices, fingerprinting, vehicle inspections and sheriff staff — underscoring the county’s ongoing operational need for secure space regardless of a final build decision.

Next steps include public engagement through town halls and an online survey, completion of a cost analysis by the consultant, and development of bond and ballot language should the board decide to pursue placement on the November ballot.