Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Commercial Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Kwik Trip convenience store and fuel station with access and facade conditions

City of Pearland City Council · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pearland council unanimously approved a conditional‑use permit for a 6,445 sq ft Kwik Trip convenience store with 16 fuel pumps at Main and McCard, imposing standard facade and canopy masonry conditions and requiring a shared access easement for adjacent properties.

Council considered a Conditional Use Permit for a 6,445 square‑foot convenience store with 16 fuel pumps on a 7.173‑acre parcel at the northwest corner of Main and McCard (applicant listed as QT South LLC; developer represented by Harrison Baldwin for Kwik Trip). Planning staff said the M‑1 zoning allows fuel sales but the convenience store component requires a CUP; staff recommended approval with three conditions: (1) the owner of PID 165736 shall grant a shared access easement to adjacent properties to provide access to McCard Road, (2) exterior building facades shall substantially conform to the renderings submitted, and (3) canopy columns shall be wrapped in masonry consistent with the principal building.

Harrison Baldwin (Kwik Trip) described the company's community commitments, estimated the store would create 20–25 jobs, and said utilities are planned to be buried pending CenterPoint confirmation. Council members asked whether 18‑wheelers would be permitted; Kwik Trip representatives said they would not provide dedicated diesel services or truck accommodations but could not guarantee an 18‑wheeler could not drive onto the site; the developer said they would not design the site to service large trucks and noted the proposed access easement was intended to separate truck traffic.

Council discussed tree preservation, masonry facade requirements, and responsibility for building and maintaining the internal access road; staff said the developer on the adjacent side would be responsible for constructing that road. With Planning & Zoning having recommended approval 6–0 and no public opposition recorded, the council approved the CUP and its conditions on a recorded vote, motion passed 7–0.