Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent urges Lee's Summit R-VII board to review special-education identification and policy IKE
Summary
A parent told the board her daughter's accelerated placement took more than a year and alleged the district ranks last among comparable districts in special-education identification; she asked the board to place policy IKE and special-education identification practices on the next work-session agenda.
Emily Seton, a parent who addressed the board during public comment, said her daughter Angelina faced lengthy delays getting accelerated placement and that the family endured repeated administrative steps, formal complaints and eventual legal involvement to obtain services.
"She believed that if her mother spoke publicly, it would be harder for this board to ignore her needs and the needs of so many children like her," Seton said. She told the board her daughter's acceleration "took over a year, multiple administrators, formal complaints to this board and, ultimately, legal involvement." Seton said most families could not endure what her family experienced and that many other children are in similar situations.
Seton made several claims about district performance that she asked the board to address publicly: she said the district has ranked "dead last in special education identification among its 15 comparable Missouri Pierce districts for seven straight years" and estimated "likely over 500 qualifying children not receiving services." She also said high‑achieving students are not being challenged early, which she described as a “tall poppy syndrome,” and asked the board to place two items on the next work‑session: policy IKE and a review of special‑education identification practices.
The board's public comment rules (policy BDDH) prohibit a board response during the meeting, and no board action was taken during the public comment period. The board may ask clarifying questions after public comment or place items on a future agenda for review; Seton requested both policy review and a public explanation of the district's identification practices and outcomes.
What happens next: Seton asked the board to place policy IKE and the district's special-education identification practices on the next work‑session agenda. The board did not take immediate action during the meeting; the request will be considered for a future work session or agenda if the board chooses to schedule it.
